Perspectives

Thought Leadership on Behavioural Science

Evidence-based insights on how decision science creates positive impact in organisations and society.

AI Adoption7 min read

The 87% Problem: Why AI Projects Fail at the Human Layer

Most AI failures aren't technical — they're behavioural. Drawing from the Technology Acceptance Model (Davis, 1989) and implementation science, we explore the five behavioural barriers that derail AI adoption and how choice architecture can address each one.

Read article
Consumer Insights8 min read

From Theory to Frameworks: Putting Behavioural Science to Work

Behavioural science has produced thousands of findings about human decision-making. But how do you translate academic research into actionable business frameworks? We outline a systematic approach using the COM-B model and Behaviour Change Wheel.

Read article
Organisational Design6 min read

Why Your Culture Initiative Failed (And What Behavioural Science Says To Do Instead)

Culture change programmes fail because they target attitudes rather than behaviours. Drawing on the Switch framework (Heath & Heath, 2010) and implementation intentions (Gollwitzer, 1999), we propose a behaviour-first approach to culture transformation.

Read article
Choice Architecture5 min read

The Default Effect: How One Simple Change Can Transform Outcomes

Organ donation rates vary from 4% to 100% across countries — not because of culture, but because of defaults. Johnson & Goldstein's (2003) research shows that the pre-selected option is the most powerful nudge available to choice architects.

Read article
Product Design6 min read

Designing for System 1: What Kahneman Teaches Product Teams

95% of purchase decisions are made by the fast, intuitive System 1 brain. Yet most product teams design for the slow, analytical System 2. Here's how to bridge the gap using processing fluency, the peak-end rule, and strategic defaults.

Read article
Leadership5 min read

The Behavioural Science of Psychological Safety

Amy Edmondson's (1999) research on psychological safety shows that high-performing teams aren't the ones that make fewer mistakes — they're the ones that surface and learn from mistakes. We translate her findings into actionable leadership behaviours.

Read article